Neighbouring countries consulted on Norwegian nuclear power plant

Adopted in 1991 in the Finnish city of Espoo and entered into force on 10 September 1997, the Espoo Convention sets out the obligations of signatory parties to assess the environmental impact of certain activities and in doing so, notify and consult other parties on all major projects where the project under consideration is likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact in that state.

Nuclear project developer Norsk Kjernekraft submitted a proposal to Norway’s Ministry of Energy in November 2023 for an assessment of the construction of the small modular reactor (SMR) plant. According to the preliminary plan, the plant will be located in a common industrial area – the Taftøy industrial park – in the border area between Aure and Heim. The plant is planned to consist of several SMRs, which together will produce around 12.5 TWh of electricity annually, if the plant is realised in its entirety.

In April this year, the Ministry of Energy, the Ministry of Health and Care Services, the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, and the Ministry of Climate and Environment requested the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, and the Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection prepare an Environmental Impact Assessment programme for the proposed plant. A notification with a proposal for an assessment programme for the establishment of a nuclear power plant in Aure and Heim municipalities was published for consultation in Norway by the Ministry of Energy in May 2024 with a deadline for submissions that same autumn.

At the request of the Ministry of Energy, the Norwegian Environment Agency has now submitted the proposed impact assessment programme for consultation by neighbouring countries, giving them the opportunity to assess the impacts this could have on them, so that this can be investigated further in a possible further process of planning the licence application and operation. The deadline for other countries to provide input to the assessment programme is 6 January 2026. After the consultation deadline, the Norwegian Environment Agency will forward any input to the Ministry of Energy as the responsible authority for further assessment.

Norsk Kjernekraft noted that this is the first of ten projects it is implementing in Norwegian municipalities has reached this stage. “Although the process concerns one location, its scope is national,” it said. “Once the neighbouring country notification is completed, the Ministry of Energy will be ready to determine the final assessment programme – the decision that formally opens the door to starting the actual impact assessment. It will also provide a clear methodological template that will allow the Ministry to more quickly process the remaining impact assessment notifications for our projects across the country.”

“The fact that the neighbouring country consultation has already been initiated is a powerful signal that the government now wants progress, not postponement. This is concrete action – and very gratifying,” said Norsk Kjernekraft CEO Jonny Hesthammer. “When the programme is determined, we can accelerate the entire application process. We save at least one year compared to if the matter had to go through full parliamentary processing before commencement. This is exactly the kind of pace Norway now needs.”

He added: “For the host municipalities, this means that the planning of a possible nuclear power investment takes a concrete and very important step forward. Norway is now building the necessary foundation to be able to realise nuclear power as part of the energy system of the future.”

Norsk Kjernekraft said that if all ten of its projects are realised, “Norway will be well on its way to doubling today’s power production by 2050 – with a minimal footprint and great importance for industrial development, technology investments and emission reductions throughout the country.”

   

  • Related Posts

    NPCIL signs MoU for Gujarat nuclear power projects

    In what it called “a significant step towards exploring new horizons for nuclear power development in Gujarat”, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) said the MoU would “facilitate collaboration between…

    Hinkley Point B becomes second AGR plant transferred for decommissioning

    Hinkley Point B – comprising two Advanced Gas-cooled Reactors (AGRs) – was first synchronised to the electricity grid in February 1976. The plant generated more than 311 terawatt-hours of electricity…

    Have You Seen?

    Japan’s JERA Creates Oil Storage Firm to Manage National Reserve Sites

    • October 2, 2026
    Japan’s JERA Creates Oil Storage Firm to Manage National Reserve Sites

    Alaska LNG Hinges on How Much Asian Buyers Will Pay for Energy Security

    • October 2, 2026
    Alaska LNG Hinges on How Much Asian Buyers Will Pay for Energy Security

    WTI Sinks Nearly 4% as EU Weighs Emergency Stockpile Release

    • October 2, 2026
    WTI Sinks Nearly 4% as EU Weighs Emergency Stockpile Release

    Latest Dallas Fed Survey Reveals Theme Among Respondents

    • October 2, 2026
    Latest Dallas Fed Survey Reveals Theme Among Respondents

    What is the near-term feasibility of helium-3 fuel for fusion power?

    • October 2, 2026
    What is the near-term feasibility of helium-3 fuel  for fusion power?

    UN Says Global Fuel Subsidies Could Top $1 Trillion

    • October 2, 2026
    UN Says Global Fuel Subsidies Could Top $1 Trillion

    JERA CEO Warns LNG Prices Have Further to Climb

    • October 2, 2026
    JERA CEO Warns LNG Prices Have Further to Climb

    Scaling up: Blue Star’s next phase in Colorado

    • October 2, 2026
    Scaling up: Blue Star’s next phase in Colorado

    Shougang, Rio Tinto commission carbon capture trial facility at China steel plant

    • October 2, 2026
    Shougang, Rio Tinto commission carbon capture trial facility at China steel plant

    Oil Prices Come Under Pressure

    • October 2, 2026
    Oil Prices Come Under Pressure