Oil prices climbed to their highest in five months on Monday as fears grew over what conflict in the Middle East could mean for supplies.
Summary
- Brent, WTI up 1% in volatile session
- Prices touched five-month high before turning negative, then recovering
- No oil supply disruption yet from US attack on Iran
- Fears Iran could close Strait of Hormuz, key oil supply route
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters) – Oil prices rose on Monday in a volatile session following the United States’ weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities, as investors weigh the potential risks to oil supply disruptions as a result of the escalating conflict.
Get the Latest US Focused Energy News Delivered to You! It’s FREE:
Brent crude futures were up 78 cents, or 1.01%, to $77.79 a barrel as of 1000 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose by 76 cents, or 1.03%, to $74.60.
U.S. President Donald Trump said he had “obliterated” Iran’s main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself.
Israel carried out fresh strikes on Iran on Monday including on capital Tehran, and Iran’s nuclear facility of Fordow which was also a target of the U.S. attack.
Iran is OPEC’s third-largest crude producer.
Iran said on Monday that the U.S. attack on its nuclear sites expanded the range of legitimate targets for its armed forces and called U.S. President Donald Trump a “gambler” for joining Israel’s military campaign against the Islamic Republic.
China meanwhile said the U.S. attack had damaged Washington’s credibility and warned that the situation “may go out of control.”
Price were volatile in Monday’s session. Both contracts touched fresh five-month highs earlier in the session of $81.40 and $78.40 respectively, before giving up their gains to turn negative during the European morning session and then recovering to a 1% gain.
Prices have risen since the start of the conflict on June 13 amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows.
However, investors are weighing up the extent of the geopolitical risk premium in oil markets given the Middle Eastern crisis is yet to impact on supply.
“The geopolitical risk premium is fading, as so far there has been no supply disruptions. But as it’s unclear how the conflict might evolve, market participants are likely to maintain a risk premium for now. So prices are set to stay volatile in the near term,” UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said.
The geopolitical risk premium includes fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows.
“All eyes remain on the Strait of Hormuz … and whether Iran will seek to disrupt tanker traffic,” Saxo Bank analyst Ole Hansen said.
Prices could spike in the short term even without full-scale disruption, if the threat of interference alone is enough to delay shipments through the Strait, Hansen added.
Goldman Sachs said in a Sunday report that Brent could briefly peak at $110 per barrel if oil flows through the critical waterway were halved for a month, and remain down by 10% for the following 11 months.
The bank still assumed no significant disruption to oil and natural gas supply, citing global incentives to try to prevent a sustained and very large disruption.
Given the Strait of Hormuz is indispensable for Iran’s own oil exports, which are a vital source of its national revenues, a sustained closure would inflict severe economic damage on Iran itself, making it a double-edged sword, said Sugandha Sachdeva, from research firm SS WealthStreet.
Reporting by Robert Harvey in London, Mohi Narayan in New Delhi, Siyi Liu in Singapore; Editing by Christopher Cushing, Kate Mayberry and David Evans
Share This:
More News Articles
