Trump Plans to Make Cold War-Era Plutonium Available for Nuclear Power

Summary

  • Radioactive, fissile plutonium from Cold War a headache for US
  • US wants to halt disposal of it, use 20 metric tons for fuel
  • Trump administration sees it as potential fuel for new reactors
  • Critic points out similar program failed due to costs

(Reuters) – The Trump administration plans to make available about 20 metric tons of Cold War-era plutonium from dismantled nuclear warheads to U.S. power companies as a potential fuel for reactors, according to a source familiar with the matter and a draft memo outlining the plan.

Plutonium has previously only been converted to fuel for commercial U.S. reactors in short-lived tests. The plan would follow through on an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in May ordering the government to halt much of its existing program to dilute and dispose of surplus plutonium, and instead provide it as a fuel for advanced nuclear technologies.


Get the Latest US Focused Energy News Delivered to You! It’s FREE:


The Department of Energy, or DOE, plans to announce in coming days it will seek proposals from industry, said the source who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The source cautioned that because the plan is still a draft, its final details could change pending further discussions.

The plutonium would be offered to industry at little to no cost — with a catch. Industry will be responsible for costs of transportation, designing, building, and decommissioning DOE-authorized facilities to recycle, process and manufacture the fuel, the memo said.

The details on the volume of the plutonium, industry’s responsibilities in the plan and the potential timing of a U.S. announcement, have not been previously reported. The 20 metric tons would be drawn from a larger, 34-metric-ton stockpile of weapons-grade plutonium that the United States had previously committed to dispose of under a non-proliferation agreement with Russia in 2000.

The Department of Energy did not confirm or deny the Reuters reporting, saying only that the department is “evaluating a variety of strategies to build and strengthen domestic supply chains for nuclear fuel, including plutonium,” as directed by Trump’s orders.

Boosting the U.S. power industry is a policy priority for the Trump administration as U.S. electricity demand rises for the first time in two decades on the boom in data centers needed for artificial intelligence.

The idea of using surplus plutonium for fuel has raised concerns among nuclear safety experts who argue a previous similar effort failed.

Under the 2000 agreement, the plutonium was initially planned to be converted to mixed oxide fuel, or MOX, to run in nuclear power plants. But in 2018, the first Trump administration killed the contract for a MOX project that it said would have cost more than $50 billion.

The U.S. Energy Department holds surplus plutonium at heavily guarded weapons facilities including Savannah River in South Carolina, Pantex in Texas, and Los Alamos in New Mexico. Plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years and must be handled with protective gear.

Until Trump’s May order, the U.S. program to dispose of the plutonium has involved blending it with an inert material and storing it in an experimental underground storage site called the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico.

The Energy Department has estimated that burying the plutonium would cost $20 billion.

“Trying to convert this material into reactor fuel is insanity. It would entail trying to repeat the disastrous MOX fuel program and hoping for a different result,” said Edwin Lyman, a nuclear physicist at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“The excess plutonium is a dangerous waste product and DOE should stick to the safer, more secure and far cheaper plan to dilute and directly dispose of it in WIPP.”

Share This:


More News Articles

 

  • Related Posts

    US Crude Refiners Are Pushing Run Rates to Maximum Levels

    By US oil refiners are running their plants harder than usual, with some even putting off maintenance, as strong profits and steady demand for fuels tempt the processors to run…

    Princeton Endowment Backs Out of Oil and Gas Divestment Pledge

    By People walk on the Princeton University campus in Princeton, New Jersey. Photographer: Craig Warga/Bloomberg Get the Latest US Focused Energy News Delivered to You! It’s FREE: Princeton University’s endowment…

    Have You Seen?

    Video | Environmental pressure driving change in semiconductors

    • June 2, 2026
    Video | Environmental pressure driving change in semiconductors

    Fluor JV can proceed with phase 2 expansion at LNG Canada

    • June 2, 2026
    Fluor JV can proceed with phase 2 expansion at LNG Canada

    Green hydrogen imports must not crowd out German electrolysis, DWV says

    • June 2, 2026
    Green hydrogen imports must not crowd out German electrolysis, DWV says

    Top 5 factors affecting Strait of Hormuz reopening

    • June 2, 2026
    Top 5 factors affecting Strait of Hormuz reopening

    Rystad: U.S.-Iran Re-Escalation Could Drive Oil To $180 By August

    • June 2, 2026
    Rystad: U.S.-Iran Re-Escalation Could Drive Oil To $180 By August

    BP Starts Production at Trillion-Cubic-Foot Gas Prize In Azerbaijan

    • June 2, 2026
    BP Starts Production at Trillion-Cubic-Foot Gas Prize In Azerbaijan

    Turkey Looks to Create Azerbaijan-Europe Electricity Corridor

    • June 2, 2026
    Turkey Looks to Create Azerbaijan-Europe Electricity Corridor

    LNG Deliveries to China Rebound in May

    • June 2, 2026
    LNG Deliveries to China Rebound in May

    Princeton Endowment Backs Out of Oil and Gas Divestment Pledge

    • June 2, 2026
    Princeton Endowment Backs Out of Oil and Gas Divestment Pledge

    US Crude Refiners Are Pushing Run Rates to Maximum Levels

    • June 2, 2026
    US Crude Refiners Are Pushing Run Rates to Maximum Levels